Complaint against Nadhilath GMart Kottayam
This case has been closed.
Nobey
Kottayam · filed 8d ago
Type
Defective Product
Place
Kottayam
Published
31 October 2026
Complaint Details
I purchased a Prestige induction cooker based on the salesperson's guidance and representations, expecting a fully functional product. However, the first unit experienced two failures and was subsequently replaced. Unfortunately, the replacement unit has also developed the same issue and is not functioning properly. The model supplied, referenced in July 2026, appears to have a recurring product defect. Despite registering complaints and making repeated follow-ups and reminders, I have not received a proper response or resolution from customer service. My calls have also gone unanswered. I have incurred expenses and inconvenience despite following the company's salesperson's guidance and cooperating with the replacement process. This reflects a serious deficiency in product quality, after-sales service, and customer grievance redressal. Requested relief: Replacement with a fully functional, reliable product of a different model or a full refund, along with appropriate compensation for the inconvenience and deficiency in service.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your experience or advice.
This is a consumer-submitted allegation and has not been independently verified by Legal Connect India Service LLP. If you are the named business and wish to respond or request a review, contact helpdesk@legalconnect.help.
Free legal guides related to this complaint — the law, what you can claim, and the process.